Economic justice and democratization of the economy to create Ideal SocietyBy Professor Viswanathan, Director of the International Socio-Economic Research Bureau (E mail ID: @ Dataone economist. In) DECLARATION OF JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTSWe, people of all countries, in line the sovereignty of universal justice that these truths are self-evident that each creator has inalienable “right to property” in their creations and natural law empowers developers that only he should use his creations exclusively for the welfare and elevation of human society as a whole, which is a member inseparable. We declare with the entire judicial branch derived from the natural laws that, among all the creations of man, his creation of capital is the only major “economic power” capable of transforming all the socio-economic-political and rebuild to conform to the aspirations of the owners of capital. We also declare unequivocally from the capital is created by the collective efforts of the people as a whole must be directly owned by the people and then only the people would ensure equality of “The necessary economic power and Economic Fundamental Rights” with that might be considered an “ideal society” in the way they want. According to “Economic Justice” when capital is directly owned by the people, declare that the people of course secure what we consider the best among the “fundamental rights and the economic” right to live ‘,’ The right to work ‘,’ Right to Economic Equality “,” The right to economic freedom ‘,’ Right to Economic Security ‘,’ Right to participate in management “,” Right to the creation of capital ‘,’ Right to live in fraternity and necessary “socio-economic and political rights to achieve the decent happiness’We proclaim that the people to ensure the aforementioned” fundamental rights “that would ultimately succeed, to establish an ideal society and just society for those working tirelessly in the transformation of one type of company to another since the dawn of civilization, and to execute his noble concept of ‘One World, One Humanity Government and people and finally victorious in the election of the form ” Economic System “that would be the best of all other systems to establish an ideal society for those who would secure all the necessary authorities of the natural laws that give the respect. 1. The emergence of economic systems: Different economic systems had appeared on the horizon of human history whenever different types of “Capital property” arose. Especially capitalism and socialism emerged after the industrial revolution in the determinant of “the ownership of capital. In general, all economic systems” share ownership “is the” basic structure “of a society in which tissues of the structure of society are super determined. The superstructure is generally present qualitative fabric of society as religion, culture, education, laws, customs and conventions, etc. are determined according to the aspirations of the owners of capital. In short, the social elements are factors dependent on ownership of capital. During the turbulent period of the 1750s outbreak of the Industrial Revolution in England and other European countries introduced the giant machines – a kind of capital – in the factory system production of goods and services. is enveloped humanity as a great flood and threw it into the societies of the world and changed every structural elements of society not so super that even trace its originality. We the people at that time were deeply perplexed and confused what to do when we were in the vicinity of absolute economic ignorance. 2. Two affidavits trade: During the Industrial Revolution, the economic environments in the factory system was not only disorder, but also demoralize societies. No one was aware of how the economy was operating and how it should be operated. Everybody expected the worst to come. Europe was plunged into complete ignorance. At this crucial period of time was Adam Smith, father of economics, published his famous book “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” in 1776. 3. Economic Affidavit of Adam Smith: In his book Adam Smith writes out an “Affidavit Economic ‘solemnly and sincerely that if we, the people entrusted to our capital for a few capitalists in the name of “capitalism” (individualism), which would not only change even sand into gold, but also foster march towards humanity ” ideal society “by the Modernization of the potential production with the help of science and technology division of labor. Completely ignoring the working class that constitutes society, Adam Smith concentered and was focused on a few capitalists and called for them without state interference, accumulate wealth of nations with the help of the division of labor with machines said modern and separate the few capitalists also create a favorable climate for the creation of the Ideal Society by increasing production of many folds. Adam Smith completely neglected the equitable distribution of wealth to the mass of the working class. He linked the establishment of an ideal society with mass production, but not for the equitable distribution of wealth. So the whole world wrong convincingly and decisively for a long period during which the working class was thrown to poverty and horrible living hood. Ricardo and Malthus, drawing thread of the arguments of the wisdom of Adam Smith, presented his views eloquently in favor of a few capitalists and also convinced people to give up his capital in the hands of capitalists who would solve all economic problems of humanity. So when the people entrusted their capital in the hands of a few capitalists a “capitalist mode of production, strong magnitudes appeared in England and other European countries. This mode of capitalist production, breaking so far valuable cultural values and customs of people, created a complex and conflicted, and very demoralizing “capitalist society.’s Newly appeared” capitalist society “forced the social elements such as the right , art, culture, customs, religion, education and other economic and political rights and freedoms of working for the benefit and security of a few capitalists, because their welfare to the welfare of working class was dependent masses. mode capitalist production became the ‘Right to live “the mass of the working class as a factor that depends on the security of the capitalist class who owned the capital and modern factories. This was because if an equity investor with its factory collapsed, livelihoods of workers working in this factory also would collapse. Thus, all the social elements ranging from culture to human freedom had to work for the security of a few capitalists. Therefore the ideal society that people dreamed for long period of time became a myth and an illusion. In the capitalist mode of production the ideal society is meant by “capitalist society representing a few capitalists. 4. Economic Counter Affidavit of Karl Marx: a gush of sympathy of the mass Vista exploited working class and endless hatred for the capitalists that may be due to the appalling poverty of workers in the troubled mentally and morally Karl Marx and Engels declared a ‘Counter statement Sworn in 1848 in his “Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and only in 1867 in his magnum opus Das Capital. In his affidavit against argued that if we, the people will lose the capital of the capitalist few with the help of the Bolsheviks (Communists) and entrusted it with the capital in the hands of ‘State’ under the control of the “proletarian dictatorship ‘ that the ‘state’, we take “Towards an ideal society” and create “one world.” * Believe it’s Counter Affidavit “word for word, in the October Revolution of 1917 we lost our little capital of capitalists and delivered to the confidence of the” State “. The State filed a” socialist mode of production “and the basis of this, a fear and subjugation ‘Socialist Society, “appeared. The working class was involved in fear and terrible, terrible confusion on the outcome of the Revolution “and totally disappointed because even trace any hope of reaching an” ideal society “that their Bolshevik masters promised during the ‘Revolution’. __________________________________________________________________ * In the words of Karl Marx: “In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of individuals to the division of labor, and thus also the antithesis between mental and physical is gone, after the hand labor has become not only a livelihood but life’s prime want, after the productive forces have also increased with the development of the individual, and all the springs of cooperative wealth flow abundantly – only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs! “- Marx (1875), pp 21 23Karl Marx and Engels were alive at the time of the October Revolution. They were great champions of the working class and ‘buts’ about it. They were concerned wept for the working class, who suffered for the working class, who sacrificed everything for the working class, and above all who were exiled, especially Karl Marx, from one country to the cause of the working class, and really wanted to see the working class of all countries into a “Society Ideal “. But the” October Revolution in Russia showed that his “Theory and Practice” did not coordinate with each other and do not work in harmony. There was something wrong in the Theory and Practice “which resulted in a total collapse of socialism in the final process. What was the fault penetrated for their collapse? I run this communion of ideas about Adam Smith and Malthus, too. I believe that when called for we the people must rely on our capital in the hands of a few capitalists, believed that the capitalists exploit the working class. But when his theories into practice was that the selfish capitalists who manipulated his theories as a convenient and powerful tools to exploit the mass of the working class. It was the capitalists who portrayed the theories in a dark night when put into practice because of their selfish motives. In other words, there is an unbridgeable gap (gap width to depth) between theory and practice that capitalists used to meet its selfish motive of profit maximization in the operation of the mass of the working class. What was the terrible failure that was penetrating here too? Although the original proponents of capitalist and socialist theories were not enemies of the working class, the executors of these theories, the capitalists, on one hand and the ‘state’, moreover deceived the working class for their selfish motives. The main fault was that we, the people, instead of maintaining the capital with us, separates us into two diametrically opposed poles, surrendered our capital to a few capitalists in Western Europe and North American countries, “State” in Russian, Chinese and other Eastern European countries. The inherent contradictions that penetrated deeply and widely on the theories and practices of the two economic systems led to a fierce and vicious spiral burst like a ‘Big Bang’ and scattered violence, but suddenly all socio-economic problems throughout the world unquenchable fire balls. terrorism of these systems in place to establish an “ideal society” two, even after a long period of experiments, have pushed mankind to the brink of nuclear holocaust and widely days – a day. 5. Democrism – Popular Direct ownership of capital: the more than 200 years, capitalism had left unexplored ways to establish an ideal society and disastrously collapsed during 1930 throughout the world due to pressure from its own weight of self-contradictions and the brutal ambition maximization of profit. Under the same conditions, communism even after exercising such cruel torture methods (ignored Stalin’s treatment of the kulaks) in the name of “proletarian dictatorship” for nearly 75 was destroyed in 1992 in its own breeding place. Since both systems are now fighting for their own survival, have decided to end the “cold war” between them. Since both the system has led us to great disappointments and not effective economic techniques to solve our economic problems, according to “Economic Justice, we the people declare to give up our own capital of both capitalists and ‘the State and keep under our direct involvement peacefully or by force if the demands of necessity and create a “new economic system” known as “Democrism ‘based on direct people ownership of capital and also declare the laws of nature have entrusted us with all executive powers to do so as our birthright. People Live share ownership of a just economic system known as’ Democrism “world will provide us with Democratic and mode of production” which is an inevitable need for the establishment of an “ideal and just society.” I dare say a few words, “Capitalism is popular and popularly defective; Socialism is destructive and destructive popular; Democrism is justifiable and unavoidable reason. “Whatever we relate to race, whatever the language we speak with, any color covers, whatever religion they follow, whatever our nationality, we are always being influenced by his justice and emphatic authority supremacy. The laws may be transient from time to time, and vary from country to country, but the concept of justice remains light source everywhere. We want justice, only justice and nothing but justice. During throughout the long passage of history we have honored justice, we held in high esteem the men of justice from King Solomon to Gandhiji. We have unshakeable faith that justice is perpetual and that spreads through the centuries. We have always fought for justice and has brought us together, without discrimination. In his book “Anatomy of Liberty ‘, William O. Douglas, Justice of the United States Supreme Court, says this truth in all aspects as follows: “The desire for justice is in fact a consolidation amon influence all races, whatever language they speak, whatever your skin is, “Douglas, William O.” Anatomy of Freedom “(p: xxiv): (1965) The universal fact is that if there is justice there will be harmony and immortality. The scientific facts are immortal because they are based on experimental truths. On the other hand, if the socio-economic principles politicians want to be immortal to be based on justice, only justice and nothing but justice and perhaps natural justice. The claim is capitalist and socialist principles of justice and therefore, the struggle in vain to solve our problems of life and progress toward its ultimate destination – the inevitable cemetery. Keeping the above facts into account I have with the utmost care and concern made the economic principles of natural justice in the name of ‘DEMOCRISM “to ensure universal acceptance. The genesis of all judges is to maintain natural’ property directly Popular of capital “for which we must give up our little capital of capitalists and ‘the state.” Why? “People are direct ownership of capital: Why do we want?” 1. The denial of natural justice ‘Right to Live “by capitalism and socialism: (Capital promotes and intensifies the war) We, the people of all countries unanimously intensely hate wars that germinate in any form or by any other cause. Naturally, we are peace loving people. Despite our strong protest of the wars have been fought around the world and billions and billions of innocent people who have no association with war, have been brutally killed and massacred and the skeletons of these people have been piled up like mountains in the cemeteries. The underlying cause of these wars? The answer is simply one word – “capital.” It is the “Capital Ownership” by a few capitalists or the ‘state’, which gives every kind of war that denies its own ‘right to live’ in the name of patriotism in particular. We will for the time being set aside the wars before the Industrial Revolution. The system facilitates factory for the production of “weapons of mass destruction” that can be used for land, sea and air. The whole world became open battlefield for nuclear bombs, ballistic missiles, supersonic aircraft, various types of military rockets and military satellites orbiting Earth. Whatever the cause of First and Second World War, although its consequences were horrible that led humanity to the brink of extinction on planet Earth. Why? Wars before and after the Industrial Revolution: Before the industrialization of the wars were fought on a battlefield particular, and between two enemy soldiers only. The range of destruction was very narrow and limited in coverage because the warriors were using spears and swords only. The weapons were manufactured in industry or by the warriors themselves. natural boundaries such as mountains, rivers, oceans and large deserts prevented the enemy to enter into an independent country. After the industrial revolution, weapons of mass destruction were produced with the help of highly sophisticated technologies, with the help of big business in factories owned by a few capitalists and ‘the State’. Nature has disappeared and the world became open field of battle. These weapons were maneuvered by only highly qualified technocrats. The technocrats used these weapons in the common innocent people to terrorize the enemy government to surrender immediately. For example, in World War II U.S. used nuclear bombs to bombard atoms of millions of Japanese civilians and terrorized the government to surrender without a fight on the battlefield. Today’s battlefields are missing and the whole world has become a battlefield open in front of powerful nuclear ballistic missiles and atomic bombs. They can be produced only with the help of scientists and enormous capital property of the State ‘and’ a ‘capitalist. While capital is owned by the State ‘and’ few capitalists “can not escape nuclear holocaust. Capital was originally created by the working class to help them increase their productivity of consumer goods. As soon as the capital came into the possession illegal State ‘and’ capitalist ‘was used for the production of weapons of mass destruction. If we scrutinize the expenses of governments around the world can detect that a large share of public expenditure has been earmarked for’ military up gradation “which to promote “education” and “elimination of poverty.” 2. ECONOMIC THEORY OF WAR: first “whether the accumulation of capital increases the temptation destructive war will increase and vice versa.” The destructive capital: capital that is used for the production of destructive weapons used by the military. Secondly, the differences in economic ideology of a country calls to increase its military power to show its ideological success of the other country and spread their ideology on other countries through war. For example U.S. and Russia used the war as a weapon to spread capitalist and socialist ideology on other countries. The pages of the past recent history illustrates the fact and the reason for the accumulation of nuclear weapons and a variety of weapons of mass destruction scientist. In third place in the globalization of world economy the rich capitalists invest large amount of excess capital in poor and developing countries. In order to protect their huge capital of the nationalization of the recipient countries need a powerful military force countries to invest. For example, the U.S. war and threatening war in the Arab countries to protect its huge investment in the exploration of oil and fuel industries. Now the American capitalists are pouring millions of dollars and billions of dollars in IT industries in India and other developing countries. U.S. capitalists believe they can protect their capital by the military power of their country. If a country tries to nationalize these industries will lead to war. Fourthly material production of industrial goods from rich countries to dump their output force poor countries through its military power. Economic occasion of two world wars: Almost after the Industrial Revolution in most European countries the capital was owned by a few individuals. Since the objective of capitalism was “profit maximization” workers are paid less and the result was the deficiency of effective demand caused by ‘up production. ” These European countries to poor countries occupied by their military and became his “political settlements” and the concept of ‘free trade’, which threw its excess production in the colonies and also exploited the wealth of the colonies. India was the prime example. With the help of the wealth exploited these “homelands” to strengthen its military power, primarily. The safety and security of the other “dictatorial European countries that had” less State or individual ownership of capital was in danger and vulnerable against the powerful capitalist countries. The detection of geographical song of these countries found that there was no country in the world to make way for the colonies to operate in order to increase their wealth and hence its military power. These countries dictatorial sniffed lately awakened to the fact that their “political and military supremacy” would be shot down quickly on the track down. To overcome the supremacy of European capitalist countries of the European dictatorial countries, found no alternative but to ‘war’ in the capitalist countries of Europe and its colonies around the world. “lust for supremacy” over other countries forced to fight two world wars. Napoleon and Hitler declared war against all of Europe because for the sake of supremacy. Ayn Rand points out emphatically the genesis of the two world wars in his book “Capitalism” as follows: … … World War was started by monarchist Germany and Czarist Russia, which dragged its allies free. The Second World War was initiated by Germany of’Nazi alliance with Soviet Russia and its attack on Polland “* – Ayn Rand:” Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal “(New American Library, p 1967): 37 In this era nuclear we witness a political and economic turmoil around the world to a mad rush to the military balance and economic supremacy. Both capitalism and socialism are not blue-print to end the possibility of World War III. Countries rich capitalists and socialists want to be richer and richer, pushing the vast majority of poor countries become poorer and poorer as the world economic reports. Today the silence of boiling turbulence in poor countries break out in a Third World War was fought between the rich north and poor countries south of the world and of a nuclear holocaust.’s why the U.S. is very interested in preventing the proliferation of nuclear technology between countries South with its military power. The only way left for mankind to stop the flow of increasingly threatens the danger of nuclear war is the implementation of economic equality for rich countries to extend a helping hand to poor countries to lift poverty and reduce the economic imbalance between rich and poor. The capitalist countries will not allow economic equality inside and outside, but to fight to defend its economic supremacy, which will be the ultimate cause of World War III. We, the people, therefore, have no alternative but to forfeit our capital of the capitalists and the ‘state’ and preserved in our “Direct ownership” command to coordinate with the natural laws to save humanity. 2. 1. The impact of world wars and the destructive capital: The First World War was fought between 1914 to 1918. During the period of four years of the war was fought violently 120 million seconds. Nearly 48 million people (including soldiers) were killed and wounded. * In other words, every 10 seconds four people were killed in killed and wounded. · Nehru, Jawaharlal: “Glimpses of world history”: p. 637In the Second World War, when the war was almost coming to an end, the August 6, 1945 an atomic bomb named ‘Little Boy’ – a new war machine until now had never experienced humanity – was dropped on Hiroshima. With 10 seconds in a million innocent people were killed. The First World War took 10 seconds to kill 4 people, but the Second World War, at its end, it took 10 seconds to kill a million innocent people. The annihilation depends on the density of the population of a city where an atomic bomb falls. Major powers like the U.S. and Russia, have accumulated in their arsenal of atomic bombs a million times more powerful than that dropped on Hiroshima. Without doubt, the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were invented by the nuclear scientists. The question is whether one billion dollars to scientists have produced their own hands or in industry or in sophisticated industries created by the huge capital. No capitalist is increasingly given the large capital to the production of weapons of mass destruction because their motto is “the maximization of profit.” Only the state can siphon huge capital for the production of atomic bombs only with the help of scientists to threaten other countries and enjoy the status of “super powers. In spite of the atomic bombs are the brain children of atomic physical capital needed for its production is financed solely by governments in secret against the will of the people. While the capital is owned by governments, whether socialist or capitalist governments, which spend much capital for the production of atomic bombs in order to achieve military supremacy over other countries or for at least a balance of military power. Broadly is the brain washing radical political core of the people under the guise of “patriotism”, “national security” and “Pride national “for the production of atomic bombs and other weapons ballistics. Since most of the Atomic Scientists are government scientists who have to produce atomic bombs at the insistence of governments on behalf of national security. “In 1943, the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos Laboratory, New Mexico, withJ. Robert Oppenheimer as its director, was assigned the task of developing a bomb anatomy. The first test at Alamogordo on July 16, 1945, was a outstandingsuccess ( desert sand was fused to glass for hundreds of meters around the site Lala). In August, two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan. ” “Hiroshima not only opened a new era of science, but a new breed of scientists, public officials whose knowledge and talent are an important part of thenational arsenal. In addition, scientists now much more aware of the position and responsibilities theirsocial.
Director of the International Socio-Economic Research, India